What is a consequence of Intentional Misconduct for commission members?

The correct answer highlights the serious implications that can arise from intentional misconduct by commission members. When an individual in this role engages in intentional misconduct, they can be held legally liable for the harm that results from their actions. This principle emphasizes the importance of ethical behavior and accountability, as it serves to protect individuals and society from potentially harmful actions taken by those in positions of authority. The idea is that when commission members knowingly act maliciously or recklessly, they should face the repercussions of their actions, which may include civil liability or other legal consequences.

The reasoning behind the other options further clarifies the principle of liability associated with intentional misconduct. Adequate protection under federal law does not apply as such protections typically extend to acts done in good faith or within the lawful scope of one's duties. Immunity from all legal actions is an incorrect assertion because intentional misconduct specifically removes any protective immunity that might otherwise apply, thus emphasizing personal accountability. Lastly, while compensation for damages may occur in the context of a legal proceeding, it is not a direct consequence of intentional misconduct; rather, it is the liability (i.e., the obligation to pay for damages caused) that stems from such misconduct.