Under what condition can practice continue during a denial process?

The correct answer is based on the premise that practice can only continue if there is no formal denial order in place. If a denial order has not yet been issued, the applicant's ability to practice is not hindered by the denial process, allowing them to continue their activities while waiting for a decision. This reflects the principle that until an official decision has been finalized, individuals are still considered eligible to practice under their current status.

In contrast, if an applicant appeals a decision, this does not automatically grant the right to continue practicing, as they are often still operating under the original denial unless otherwise explicitly stated. The availability of another supervisor does not determine the applicant's right to practice either; that right hinges on the status of their application. Lastly, having passed the laws exam may be a part of the licensure requirements, but it does not directly affect the ability to practice if the applicant is currently facing a denial.