Obligations for a defaulting state may include which of the following?

The obligations for a defaulting state often involve increased scrutiny of state practices. This scrutiny is essential as it allows for a more in-depth examination of the state's ability to fulfill its responsibilities, particularly in areas such as public welfare, mental health services, and overall compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Increased scrutiny typically arises when a state fails to meet certain obligations, leading to oversight or intervention to ensure that necessary standards are being maintained.

In this context, the understanding is that when a state defaults—whether it’s failing to provide certain services or meet specific regulatory or financial commitments—there is a heightened responsibility to analyze and possibly rectify the way services are delivered or how policies are implemented. This mechanism serves both to protect the welfare of the residents and to encourage the state to take corrective measures to meet its obligations effectively.

Other aspects, such as freedom from rule enforcement, longer terms of commitment, or responsibility for additional funding, do not accurately reflect the consequences usually faced by a defaulting state, which typically involves more oversight and accountability rather than relief from obligations or extended commitments.